A bitter High Court dispute has broken out involving prospective neighbours around the construction of a wall at a coastal web page in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario that has attracted nationwide attention subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions report about René Collier plus the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has evolved right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Distinctive Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result spots are matter to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental law. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, and that is partly built, is in the correct situation. Their lawful team has characterised the action as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding to be able to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal arranging disputes, where by sights of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-significant drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Times, a picture that has because become emblematic with the intensity of your dispute. These steps were not merely symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Situations documented, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o for the duration of serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became one of the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps had been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the background Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on regardless of whether interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, has become called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject claims that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting rather that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few just trying to create a household home in accordance Using the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Special Location of Conservation and say that all works are actually performed dependant on Expert tips and accredited options. Their attorneys have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes entering The ocean for the duration of a storm, will not alter the fundamental information.
The case has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute about design of wall at coastal web-site happens to be a shorthand description for just a problem that numerous observers see as increasingly frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between personal land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become more contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier observed that the businessman had previously been involved in community advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from very unique professional backgrounds can discover by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through midsection-higher h2o for the duration of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Moments and René Collier waded by way of midsection-superior drinking water throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both equally the Bodily reality of the coastline plus the symbolic character of your act. For supporters of your plaintiffs, these actions shown dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
As the High Court proceedings carry on, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket have to determine if the wall as created complies with setting up authorization and no matter whether any encroachment right into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and preparing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who will have to Stay along with each other extensive once the legal costs have been compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, though the implications of the case lengthen outside of that address. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. What's more, it underscores how quickly a local disagreement can escalate when essential concerns for example environmental defense and house rights are perceived to become at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a place of all-natural natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. No matter if it is going to finally be altered, eliminated, or finished as prepared will rely on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will very likely continue to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.